Interaction of <i> <scp>M</scp> oniliophthora perniciosa </i> biotypes with <scp>M</scp> icro‐ <scp>T</scp> om tomato: a model system to investigate the witches' broom disease of <i> <scp>T</scp> heobroma cacao </i>

Juliana Deganello, Gildemberg Amorim Leal, M. L. Rossi, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres, Antônio Figueira

Plant Pathology · 2014 · 19 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The miniature tomato ( S olanum lycopersicum ) cultivar Micro‐Tom ( MT ) has become an important platform to investigate plant–pathogen interactions. In the case of the witches' broom disease of T heobroma cacao (cacao), the existence of M oniliophthora perniciosa isolates pathogenic to Solanaceae (S‐biotype) may enable the use of MT to circumvent limitations of the cacao host, whereas the availability of a non‐infective cacao C‐biotype allows the evaluation of contrasting responses of MT . Infection of MT by the S‐biotype led to stem swelling and axillary shoot growth to form broom‐like symptoms similar to the biotrophic phase in cacao, but the infected tissues did not progress to necrosis. Conversely, inoculation with the C‐biotype did not cause typical symptoms, but reduced plant height, appearing as a non‐host interaction. Histopathological characterization of the S‐biotype infection of MT by light and electron microscopy indicated limited germ tube penetration, preferentially through wounds at the base of trichomes or actively through the epidermis. No intracellular mycelium was observed, corroborating the lack of the necrotrophic stage of the pathogen. The analysis of gene expression during the interaction between the S‐ or C‐biotype with MT indicated that expression of plant defence‐associated genes differs for kinetics and intensity between a compatible or incompatible M . perniciosa– MT interaction. The pattern of spore germination and low rate of mycelia penetration suggests that the S‐biotype is not a fully adapted tomato pathogen, but possibly a case of broken non‐host resistance, and evidence suggests the occurrence of a non‐host MT response against the C‐biotype.

References

29