Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Out-Group Attitude: An Integrative Model

TLDR

The study tested an integrative model linking quantitative, qualitative, and intergroup contact dimensions to intergroup anxiety, perceived out‑group variability, and out‑group attitude. Data were collected in a field study of Hindu minority and Muslim majority participants in Bangladesh to assess contact dimensions. Path analysis revealed that contact dimensions significantly predicted intergroup anxiety, perceived out‑group variability, and out‑group attitude, with quantitative contact affecting variability, qualitative contact affecting attitude, and intergroup anxiety mediating between contact and the other outcomes.

Abstract

This study tested an integrative model of how dimensions of contact (quantitative, qualitative, and intergroup) are related to intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out group attitude. Data were collected in a field study of minority (Hindu) and majority (Muslim) religious groups in Bangladesh. Path analysis revealed that dimensions of contact were significant predictors of all three criterion variables, although different dimensions emerged as predictors in each case, and there were some interactions with subjects' religious group. AU three dimensions of contact were associated with intergroup anxiety, but whereas quantitative contact had a significant impact on perceived out-group variability, qualitative contact was associated with out-group attitude. The model highlights the central role of intergroup anxiety as associated with dimensions of contact and as a predictor of perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude.