Abstract and Applied Analysis · 2014 · 70 citations · 31 references
ComputingComputer ScienceIndustrial EngineeringData MiningMachine LearningStatistical LearningClassificationFault DetectionFault DiagnosisKernel MethodsPattern RecognitionSupport Vector MachinesAccuracyCross-validationFault Detection Using Machine LearningMachine Learning For Fault DetectionProcess Fault DetectionProcess Fault DiagnosisSupport Vector Machine ClassificationSvms
This paper investigates the proficiency of support vector machine (SVM) using datasets generated by Tennessee Eastman process simulation for fault detection. Due to its excellent performance in generalization, the classification performance of SVM is satisfactory. SVM algorithm combined with kernel function has the nonlinear attribute and can better handle the case where samples and attributes are massive. In addition, with forehand optimizing the parameters using the cross-validation technique, SVM can produce high accuracy in fault detection. Therefore, there is no need to deal with original data or refer to other algorithms, making the classification problem simple to handle. In order to further illustrate the efficiency, an industrial benchmark of Tennessee Eastman (TE) process is utilized with the SVM algorithm and PLS algorithm, respectively. By comparing the indices of detection performance, the SVM technique shows superior fault detection ability to the PLS algorithm.
31
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 40.5K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
Yuhai Wu, Vladimir Vapnik · Technometrics · 1999 · 27K citations
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Bernhard E. Boser, Isabelle Guyon, Vladimir Vapnik · 1992 · 11.6K citations