Clinical Endocrinology · 2012 · 15 citations · 24 references
MedicineImmunologyPathologyCancer ImmunologyCancer ScreeningNeoplasiaBenign Thyroid DiseaseCancer BiomarkersThyroid CancerThyroid CytologyThyroid Nodule EvaluationTumor AntigensAutoantibody AssaysAutoimmune Thyroid Disease TestingBenign Thyroid NeoplasmsDiagnostic SensitivityFollicular Thyroid NeoplasmsSerological BiomarkersSerological ScreeningThyroid Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology
BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are common among adults, and accurate diagnosis is critical in for management decisions. Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology are the most common methods to evaluate nodules, but they are not practical for screening large numbers of patients because of cost and time considerations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to isolate an autoantibody to tumour antigen, WD repeat domain 1 (WDR1), and evaluate its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for thyroid neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated serological biomarkers in patients with thyroid carcinoma who had a poor prognosis. Using a serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression cloning (SEREX) strategy, we isolated WDR1 and its specific autoantibody in the sera of patients with undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma (UTC). We examined using indirect ELISA, the titre of the anti-WDR1 antibody (AWA) in 54 study patients: 10 with UTC, 20 with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), 17 with benign thyroid nodule (BTN), 7 with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), as well as 38 controls (N). RESULTS: WDR1 was ubiquitously expressed in various types of thyroid tissues. However, the titre of AWA in UTC and PTC was significantly higher than that in BTN, AITD and N (P < 0·001). No significant correlation was observed between thyroid function, serum thyroglobulin and tumour diameter. The cut-off value estimated using ROC to differentiate malignancies from others was 0·95 (sensitivity 96·7%, specificity 91·9%, AUC 0·969, P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-WDR1 antibody could be a novel approach for serological screening of PTC and UTC, and could be an efficient and inexpensive biomarker.
24
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Lynn A. G. Ries, D. Harkins, Martin Krapcho et al. · ScholarWorks - Georgia State University (Georgia State University) · 2006 · 11.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Biostatistics, Oncology +12
Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973-2002
Louise Davies, H. Gilbert Welch · JAMA · 2006 · 3.4K citations
Ian Hay, Geoffrey B. Thompson, Clive S. Grant et al. · World Journal of Surgery · 2002 · 751 citations