Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014 · 37 citations · 13 references
MedicinePharmacologyPharmacotherapyChemotherapyClinical PharmacologyPharmacovigilanceAdverse Effects Of ChemotherapyAntiemetic PharmacologyAntiemetic TherapyNausea ControlNausea ManagementVomiting ControlAcute Adverse EventsAcute Chemotherapy-induced NauseaAcute Chemotherapy-induced VomitingChemotherapy-induced Nausea PreventionDelayed Chemotherapy-induced NauseaDelayed Chemotherapy-induced VomitingExtended-release Formulation EvaluationNausea And Vomiting Control
PURPOSE: Subcutaneous APF530 provides controlled sustained release of granisetron to prevent acute (0-24 h) and delayed (24-120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial compared APF530 and palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed CINV after moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS: Patients receiving single-day MEC or HEC received single-dose APF530 250 or 500 mg subcutaneously (SC) (granisetron 5 or 10 mg) or intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg. Primary objectives were to establish APF530 noninferiority to palonosetron for preventing acute CINV following MEC or HEC and delayed CINV following MEC and to determine APF530 superiority to palonosetron for preventing delayed CINV following HEC. The primary efficacy end point was complete response (CR [using CI difference for APF530-palonosetron]). A lower confidence bound greater than -15 % indicated noninferiority. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat population (MEC = 634; HEC = 707), both APF530 doses were noninferior to palonosetron in preventing acute CINV after MEC (CRs 74.8 % [-9.8, 9.3] and 76.9 % [-7.5, 11.4], respectively, vs. 75.0 % palonosetron) and after HEC (CRs 77.7 % [-11.5, 5.5] and 81.3 % [-7.7, 8.7], respectively, vs. 80.7 % palonosetron). APF530 500 mg was noninferior to palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after MEC (CR 58.5 % [-9.5, 12.1] vs. 57.2 % palonosetron) but not superior in preventing delayed CINV after HEC. Adverse events were generally mild and unrelated to treatment, the most common (excluding injection-site reactions) being constipation. CONCLUSIONS: A single subcutaneous APF530 injection offers a convenient alternative to palonosetron for preventing acute and delayed CINV after MEC or HEC.
13
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
Yosef Hochberg · Biometrika · 1988 · 4.7K citations
Richard J. Gralla, M. Lichinitser, S. van der Vegt et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2003 · 471 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Incidence of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics
Steven M. Grunberg, Robert Deuson, Panagiotis Mavros et al. · Cancer · 2004 · 470 citations · Full text
Nursing, Oncology, Oncology Nursing +15
Mitsue Saito, Kenjiro Aogi, Ikuo Sekine et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2009 · 434 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +14
Peter D. Eisenberg, Jazmin Figueroa‐Vadillo, Rosalio Zamora et al. · Cancer · 2003 · 404 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17