Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with <scp>G</scp>reek, <scp>I</scp>ranian, <scp>A</scp>nglo‐<scp>A</scp>ustralian and <scp>I</scp>ndigenous groups

Abstract

The level and nature of trust in the screening process varied between the CALD groups. Addressing program misconceptions, clarifying the FOBT capabilities and involving medical services in collecting and transporting the samples may increase trust in the NBCSP. However, broader and more enduring mistrust in services and institutions may need to be dealt with in order to increase trust and participation.