A centralized energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks

Siva D. Muruganathan, Dexin Ma, R.I. Bhasin, Abraham O. Fapojuwo

IEEE Communications Magazine · 2005 · 888 citations · 10 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Wireless sensor networks consist of battery‑powered nodes that are often inaccessible after deployment, making energy efficiency a critical design goal to extend network lifetime, a challenge addressed by numerous existing protocols. This study proposes the base‑station controlled dynamic clustering protocol (BCDCP), a centralized routing scheme that distributes energy dissipation evenly among sensor nodes to enhance network lifetime and average energy savings. BCDCP dynamically clusters nodes under base‑station control and is evaluated against clustering‑based schemes such as LEACH, LEACH‑C, and PEGASIS. Simulation results demonstrate that BCDCP reduces overall energy consumption and extends network lifetime compared to its counterparts.

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks consist of small battery powered devices with limited energy resources. Once deployed, the small sensor nodes are usually inaccessible to the user, and thus replacement of the energy source is not feasible. Hence, energy efficiency is a key design issue that needs to be enhanced in order to improve the life span of the network. Several network layer protocols have been proposed to improve the effective lifetime of a network with a limited energy supply. In this article we propose a centralized routing protocol called base-station controlled dynamic clustering protocol (BCDCP), which distributes the energy dissipation evenly among all sensor nodes to improve network lifetime and average energy savings. The performance of BCDCP is then compared to clustering-based schemes such as low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH), LEACH-centralized (LEACH-C), and power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems (PEGASIS). Simulation results show that BCDCP reduces overall energy consumption and improves network lifetime over its comparatives.

References

10