IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 1971 · 110 citations · 10 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringMathematicsInformation TheoryMeasurement InvarianceProbability TheoryGaussian ProcessesNoiseSignal Detection TheoryCovariance EstimationCovariance Function EstimationCovariance Function ModelingCovariance FunctionsDetectionGaussian Signal Detection TheoryNoise EstimationTest Statistic
The concept of invariance in hypothesis testing is brought to bear on the problem of detecting signals of known form and unknown energy in Gaussian noise of unknown level. The noise covariance function is assumed to be <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K(t,u) = \sigma^2 \pho(t,u)</tex> where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\rho(t,u)</tex> is the known form of the covariance function and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\sigma^2</tex> is the unknown level. Classical approaches to signal detection depend on the assumption that <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K(t,u)</tex> is known completely. Then, a correlation-type receiver that is the uniformly most powerful (UMP) test of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H_o</tex> (signal absent) versus <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H_1</tex> (signal present) can be derived. When <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\sigma^2</tex> is unknown, there exists no UMP test. However, it is shown in this paper that there exists a test of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H_o</tex> versus <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H_1</tex> that is UMP-invariant for a very natural group of transformations on the space of observations. The derived test is found to be independent of knowledge about the noise level <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\sigma^2</tex> , since the derived test (receiver) contains an error-free estimate of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\sigma^2</tex> . This utopian conclusion is reconciled by noting that the derived receiver can never be physically realized. It is shown that any physically realizable version of the receiver has a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t</tex> -distributed test statistic. This permits choice of operating receiver thresholds and evaluation of performance characteristics.
10
<i>Statistical Theory Of Signal Detection</i>
Carl W. Helstrom, Fred L. Wilson · Physics Today · 1970 · 849 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering +12
Testing Statistical Hypotheses.
W. H. Williams, E. L. Lehmann · American Mathematical Monthly · 1960 · 406 citations