Water Resources Research · 1986 · 464 citations · 49 references
Landscape HydrologyEngineeringHumid Headwater CatchmentsWater Come FromEarth ScienceCatchment ScaleStorm Runoff GenerationWatershed HydrologyStreamflow ResponseHydrometeorologySurface RunoffUrban HydrologyGeographyHydrologySediment TransportWater ResourcesStormwater ManagementNew ZealandSurface-water HydrologyHydrological ScienceStorm Runoff
Storm runoff production in highly responsive catchments remains poorly understood. The study presents comprehensive hydrometric and tracer data from the Tawhai State Forest catchments to elucidate key runoff processes. The authors investigate small, steep, permeable catchments using detailed hydrograph separation of throughflow and streamflow. Long‑term tracer data reveal that catchment outflow behaves as a well‑mixed reservoir with a ~4‑month residence time, and only ~3% of storm runoff is new water, indicating that rapid subsurface flow cannot explain streamflow response. See parts 2 and 3 of the series for detailed hydrograph separation studies.
Production of storm runoff in highly responsive catchments is not well understood. We report in these papers a comprehensive set of hydrometric and natural tracer data for rainfall, soil water, and streamflow for catchments in the Tawhai State Forest, Westland, New Zealand, which reveal some of the important runoff processes. The catchments are small (< 4 ha), with short (< 300 m) steep (average 34°) slopes and thin (< 1 m) permeable soils. Long‐term (1977–1980) weekly observations of oxygen 18, electrical conductivity, and chloride in the stream, groundwater, and rain in the main study catchment indicate that catchment outflow reflects a well‐mixed reservoir with a mean residence time of approximately 4 months. A preliminary storm hydrograph separation using oxygen 18 (for a storm hydrograph exceeded by only 22% of events since 1979) indicates that only 3% of storm runoff could be considered “new” (i.e., current storm) water. Rapid subsurface flow, such as macropore flow, of new water therefore cannot explain streamflow response in the study area. More detailed hydrograph separation studies on throughflow as well as streamflow are described in parts 2 (M. G. Sklash et. al., this issue) and 3 (M. G. Sklash et. al., unpublished manuscript, 1986).
49
Macropores and water flow in soils
Keith Beven, Peter Germann · Water Resources Research · 1982 · 2.7K citations
Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis
Max Coleman, T. J. Shepherd, John J. Durham et al. · Analytical Chemistry · 1982 · 1.3K citations
Organic Geochemistry, Chemical Engineering, Gaseous Reduction +13