Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2010 · 31 citations · 15 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingBacterial IdentificationInfectious Disease DetectionMolecular DiagnosisPathogen DetectionBacterial DetectionCarbapenem-nonsusceptible IsolatesCarbapenemase EnzymesEnterobacteriaceae DetectionMicrobial Isolate ScreeningMolecular Detection Of BacteriaPathogen Detection SensitivityPathogen Susceptibility Surveillance
Imipenem and meropenem Vitek 2 MICs were evaluated for a panel of 104 Enterobacteriaceae for identification of carbapenemase producers. The sensitivity and specificity values for the new CLSI interpretative criteria (CLSI document M100-S20-U, 2010) were 98% and 83% for imipenem and 76% and 83% for meropenem, respectively. We propose an algorithm that is highly sensitive (98%) and specific (94%) for carbapenemase screening based on the combined use of imipenem and meropenem MICs.
15
Michel Doumith, Matthew J. Ellington, David M. Livermore et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2009 · 439 citations · Full text
Christian G. Giske, Lena Gezelius, Ørjan Samuelsen et al. · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · 2010 · 214 citations