LIBERALISM WITHOUT HUMANISM: MICHEL FOUCAULT AND THE FREE-MARKET CREED, 1976–1979

Michael C. Behrent

Modern Intellectual History · 2009 · 129 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

In the 1970s, France’s rehabilitation of economic liberalism and Foucault’s critique of state power led him to view economic liberalism—not its political form—as the modern paradigm compatible with his philosophical antihumanism. The article argues that Foucault’s brief, strategic endorsement of economic liberalism in the late 1970s was possible because he saw no conflict between his antihumanism and liberalism, challenging conventional readings that link the two. The study finds that Foucault did not critique neoliberalism during this period but instead strategically endorsed it, demonstrating compatibility between his antihumanism and economic liberalism.

Abstract

This article challenges conventional readings of Michel Foucault by examining his fascination with neoliberalism in the late 1970s. Foucault did not critique neoliberalism during this period; rather, he strategically endorsed it. The necessary cause for this approval lies in the broader rehabilitation of economic liberalism in France during the 1970s. The sufficient cause lies in Foucault's own intellectual development: drawing on his long-standing critique of the state as a model for conceptualizing power, Foucault concluded, during the 1970s, that economic liberalism, rather than “discipline,” was modernity's paradigmatic power form. Moreover, this article seeks to clarify the relationship between Foucault's philosophical antihumanism and his assessment of liberalism. Rather than arguing (as others have) that Foucault's antihumanism precluded a positive appraisal of liberalism, or that the apparent reorientation of his politics in a more liberal direction in the late 1970s entailed a partial retreat from antihumanism, this article contends that Foucault's brief, strategic, and contingent endorsement of liberalism was possible precisely because he saw no incompatibility between antihumanism and liberalism—but only liberalism of the economic variety. Economic liberalism alone, and not its political iteration, was compatible with the philosophical antihumanism that is the hallmark of Foucault's thought.

References

19