International Journal of Pest Management · 1993 · 14 citations · 3 references
AgricultureCrop SciencesWeed ScienceCrop-weed CompetitionCropping SystemsWeed BiologyCritical Period Of Weed ControlCrop CompetitionCrop-weed InteractionsWeed CompetitionWeed ManagementWeed SuppressionCritical Period EffectsIntegrated Weed SuppressionWeed Competition DynamicsWeed Competition Effects On YieldWeed Growth SuppressionYield Loss AnalysisYield Loss Due To WeedsYield Loss Reduction
Abstract The critical period of rice‐weed competition was studied for the rice varieties Oryzica 1 and CICA 8, in 1989 and 1990. Weed species were Eleusine indca, Echinochloa crus‐galli, Echinochloa colonum, Cyperus difformis, Cyperus esculentus, Cyperus iria, Leptochloa filiformis and Eclipta alba. Competition effects were similar for both varieties. Weeds emerging with the crop were the most damaging ones. Rice yields increased with longer weed‐free periods up to 70 days after emergence (d.a.e.). Weed emergence and growth after 70 d.a.e. was suppressed by the crop. Both rice cultivars required a critical height of 44–50 cm to suppress weed growth at 70 d.a.e. Though both varieties were equally weed suppressive by 70 d.a.e., leaf area index of CICA 8 was much larger than that of Oryzica 1 when rice grew weed‐free after emergence. Economic analysis showed that under heavy weed infestations, in a system where rice cannot be early and continuously flooded, three post‐emergent herbicide applications at 9, 18, and 44 d.a.e were justified.
3
Competition of Late-Emerging Weeds with Sugarbeets
J. H. Dawson · Weed Science · 1977 · 34 citations