Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships.

92

Citations

29

References

2009

Year

TLDR

The authors statistically address the largely conceptual debate about the multidimensional nature of received support in intimate relationships. The Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale (SIRRS) was factor analyzed in three samples of dating and married couples. A novel, reliable, and valid four‑factor structure—esteem/emotional, physical comfort, informational, and tangible support—was identified and cross‑validated across dating and marital couples, both sexes, and over time, and each type showed incremental predictive value for marital adjustment, depression, and anxiety, marking the first analytic derivation and replication of partner support types in intimate relationships.

Abstract

The authors of the present study statistically address the largely conceptual debate about the multidimensional nature of received support in intimate relationships. The Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale (SIRRS) was factor analyzed in 3 samples of dating and married couples. A novel, 4-factor structure of support types was generated that constituted esteem/emotional, physical comfort, informational, and tangible support types. This structure was reliable and valid in dating and marital relationships, across men and women, and across time. Each support type also demonstrated incremental validity for explaining marital adjustment, depression symptoms, and anxiety symptoms longitudinally. This study is among the first to generate and cross-validate a factor analytically derived set of support types for received support and the first to do so regarding partner support specifically. This is also the first study to replicate a distinct set of support types across different types of intimate relationships, across both sexes, and over time within relationships. Implications for enhancing functional theories of support and for augmenting the construct validity of a multidimensional model of received support are discussed.

References

YearCitations

Page 1