Journal of Analytical Toxicology · 2011 · 12 citations · 7 references
MedicinePharmacologyToxicologyAnalytical ToxicologyClinical PharmacologySubstance Use DisordersOpioid AnalgesicsOpioid PharmacologyOpioid RegulationOpioid TherapyOpioid ToxicologyOpioid Use DisorderImmunoassay Drug ScreeningOral Fluid CollectionOral Fluid Opioid TestingScreening Cutoff DeterminationSynthetic Opioid DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryTandem Mass Spectrometry AnalysisUrine Opioid Testing
A retrospective analysis of data from oral fluid specimens was conducted in order to identify a relevant cutoff concentration for opiates and/or synthetic opiates in oral fluid. Previously proposed regulations from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) have recommended 40 μg/L as a cutoff concentration. In this study, data from oral fluid specimens collected using the Quantisal™ device and screened with enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for both opiates and oxycodone were retrospectively assessed for screen positives > 20 μg/L and those between negative and 20 μg/L. Specimens identified at these concentrations were then analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectral detection using a fully validated procedure. Overall, 156 positive specimens were identified using 40 μg/L; 191 specimens using 20 μg/L; and 241 specimens between negative and 20 μg/L. Specifically, the number of 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM) positives increased from 10 to 16; morphine 4 to 9; codeine from 11 to 19; oxycodone from 56 to 74; hydrocodone from 73 to 119; and hydromorphone from 2 to 4 when specimens with enzyme inhibition between negative and 20 μg/L were analyzed. For workplace testing where only codeine, morphine, and 6-AM are considered, the use of a lowered cutoff concentration produced significant increases in the positive rate.
7