Publication | Closed Access
How to protect environment and employees against cytotoxic agents, the UZ Ghent experience
66
Citations
14
References
2001
Year
Luer Lock SyringesClassical SystemSurface Contamination RatePharmacokineticsHealth ProtectionPreventive MedicineDrug PurityEnvironmental HealthBioanalysisPharmaceutical TechnologyDrug TestToxicologyAnalytical ChemistryDrug MonitoringClinical ChemistryPublic HealthLaboratory MedicineChromatographyUz Ghent ExperiencePharmacologyOccupational HygieneMedicineCytotoxic AgentsDrug DiscoveryDrug Analysis
Objective. To compare two different systems for the reconstitution and preparation of cytotoxic drug-containing infusion bags. The Classical System (open) uses Luer lock syringes and needles, and the PhaSeal A System (closed) uses special devices. Methods. Both wipe samples of the Biological Safety Cabinet (BSC) plus surroundings and urine analysis of technicians and pharmacists involved in the preparatory activities were used. Analyses were performed using gas chromatography in tandem with mass spectroscopy. Results. An important difference has been found in the surface contamination rate and in the number, periods and values of contaminated urine samples in favour of the closed PhaSeal A System. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2001) 6, 146-152.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1