2002 · 23 citations · 2 references
ComputingQuality ManagementQuality EngineeringQuality ImprovementSoftware EngineeringProcess Capability AnalysisProcess ModelingQuality ObjectivesSoftware MetricsSoftware Process ModelsSoftware Quality AssuranceProcess CapabilityProcess Capability ImprovementProcess Capability MeasurementProcess Capability ModelingSample SpacesSoftware Development MethodologySoftware Process AssessmentSoftware Process Improvement
This paper comparatively analyses the current models for software process assessment and improvement (SPA/SPI) e.g., SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP. The configuration of the sample spaces and the partially overlapped fundamental process activities defined in the four models are quantitatively analysed and contrasted. The features, orientation, profile and correlation in the software process capability determination frameworks of the current models are comparatively evaluated. The analysis results provide the software development organisations with a complete and objective view of the strengths, weaknesses and interrelationships of these four SPA/SPI models, so the most appropriate models can be chosen for their crucial long-term SPA/SPI pursuit.
2
Bootstrap: fine-tuning process assessment
V. Haase, Richard Messnarz, Georg Koch et al. · IEEE Software · 1994 · 93 citations
Quantitative analysis of compatibility and correlation of the current SPA/SPI models
Yikun Wang, Ian Court, Margaret Ross et al. · 2002 · 14 citations