Publication | Open Access
Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources
295
Citations
82
References
2008
Year
EngineeringInternational EconomicsClimate ModelingEmission InventoryAtmospheric ModelEarth System ScienceEarth ScienceAtmospheric ScienceEconomic AnalysisChemical Transport ModelEconomic Impact AnalysisPublic PolicyEconomicsAtmospheric InteractionRegional EconomicsEarth's ClimateClimate DynamicsEconomic PolicyU.s. SourcesAtmospheric Impact AssessmentBusinessAtmospheric ProcessGlobal Emission Inventory
We use a 3‐D chemical transport model (the GEOS‐Chem CTM) to evaluate a global emission inventory for ethane (C 2 H 6 ), with a best estimate for the global source of 13 Tg yr −1 , 8.0 Tg yr −1 from fossil fuel production, 2.6 Tg yr −1 from biofuel, and 2.4 Tg yr −1 from biomass burning. About 80% of the source is emitted in the Northern Hemisphere. The model generally provides a reasonable and unbiased simulation of surface air observations, column measurements, and aircraft profiles worldwide, including patterns of geographical and seasonal variability. The main bias is a 20%–30% overestimate at European surface sites. Propagation of the C 2 H 6 seasonal signal from northern midlatitudes to the equatorial western Pacific and the southern tropics demonstrates the dominance of northern midlatitudes as a source of C 2 H 6 worldwide. Interhemispheric transport provides the largest C 2 H 6 source to the Southern Hemisphere (1.7 Tg yr −1 ), and southern biomass burning provides the other major source (1.0 Tg yr −1 ). The C 2 H 6 emission inventory for the United States from the Environmental Protection Agency (0.6 Tg yr −1 ) is considerably lower than our estimate constrained by extensive aircraft observations in the continental boundary layer (2.4 Tg yr −1 ). This appears to reflect a factor 7 underestimate in the fossil fuel source over the south‐central United States. Our estimate of C 2 H 6 emissions, together with observed ratios of CH 4 :C 2 H 6 , suggests that CH 4 emissions from energy production in the U.S. may be underestimated by as much as 50%–100%.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1