Estimating the costs and health benefits of water and sanitation improvements at global level

Laurence Haller, Guy Hutton, Jamie Bartram

Journal of Water and Health · 2007 · 208 citations · 6 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study aimed to estimate the costs and health benefits of improving water supply, sanitation, piped water, sewerage, and household water treatment across ten WHO sub‑regions. It evaluated cost‑effectiveness by calculating US dollars per disability‑adjusted life year (DALY) averted for each intervention. Almost all interventions proved cost‑effective, with CERs ranging from US$20 per DALY averted for point‑of‑use disinfection to US$13,000 per DALY averted for improved water and sanitation facilities; piped water and sewage connections had the greatest health impact, while household water treatment was the most cost‑effective.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the costs and the health benefits of the following interventions: increasing access to improved water supply and sanitation facilities, increasing access to in house piped water and sewerage connection, and providing household water treatment, in ten WHO sub-regions. The cost-effectiveness of each intervention was assessed in terms of US dollars per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted. This analysis found that almost all interventions were cost-effective, especially in developing countries with high mortality rates. The estimated cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) varied between US$20 per DALY averted for disinfection at point of use to US$13,000 per DALY averted for improved water and sanitation facilities. While increasing access to piped water supply and sewage connections on plot was the intervention that had the largest health impact across all sub-regions, household water treatment was found to be the most cost-effective intervention. A policy shift to include better household water quality management to complement the continuing expansion of coverage and upgrading of services would appear to be a cost-effective health intervention in many developing countries.

References

6