Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2011 · 19 citations · 22 references
MedicineObstetricsSurgeryFemale UrologyObstetric SurgeryUrogenital SurgeryLower Urinary Tract ReconstructionPelvic Floor DisordersPelvic Organ ProlapseReconstructive Urogenital SurgeryUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Tract ReconstructionAnal Sphincter ImagingAnal Sphincter ReconstructionFourth-degree Perineal TearsInternal Anal SphincterObstetric Anal Sphincter Injury RepairObstetric Three-dimensional UltrasonographyPrimary Surgical RepairThird-degree Perineal Tears
OBJECTIVE: To determine if anatomic primary repair with end-to-end reconstruction of the external anal sphincter (EAS) in its full length combined with separate repair of coexisting internal anal sphincter (IAS) tear, when present, results in less incontinence and better anal sphincter integrity compared with conventional primary end-to-end repair in which the IAS is not actively reconstructed. METHODS: Women who sustained third- or fourth-degree obstetric tears were included prospectively in the study following anatomic primary repair. Women treated with conventional primary repair prior to the study period comprised the control group. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) images were classified according to the EAUS defect score, and incontinence according to St Mark's score. RESULTS: Sixty-three women were included in the study group and 61 in the control group, with mean follow-up times of 11 and 21 months, respectively. Among women who had not delivered vaginally prior to the tear, St Mark's score ≥ 3 was reported by 9.6% (5/52) in the study group and 37.5% (15/40) in the control group at follow-up (P = 0.002). The corresponding numbers among women who had previously delivered vaginally were 36.4% (4/11) and 42.9% (9/21), respectively (non-significant). St Mark's score correlated with the EAUS defect score (P = 0.017). An EAS defect exceeding 50% of the sphincter length was significantly less common in the study group, and in a multivariable logistic regression model, mode of repair (anatomic vs conventional) was the only factor explaining the difference in EAS sphincter length between the two groups (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Improved continence status after anatomic primary repair was associated with a better longitudinal reconstruction of the EAS, while the integrity of the IAS did not differ between the groups. Women with a history of vaginal delivery prior to the sphincter tear had an inferior outcome regardless of mode of repair.
22
Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal Delivery
Abdul H. Sultan, Michael A. Kamm · New England Journal of Medicine · 1993 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +10
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair
Abdul H. Sultan, Michael A. Kamm, C. N. Hudson et al. · BMJ · 1994 · 766 citations
Medicine, Obstetrics, Surgery +16