Publication | Open Access
UNPACKING “TRANSNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP”
304
Citations
84
References
2005
Year
Human MigrationNationalismInternational SociologyGlobal StudiesSocial SciencesCitizenship StudiesPolitical ScienceTransnational NetworkTransnational CitizenshipTransnational Civil SocietyWorld PoliticsDiaspora StudyPolitical ParticipationCulturePolitical GeographyPolitical PluralismTransnational MobilityAnthropologyArtsNational Identity
Transnational citizenship is a contested concept that extends beyond nation‑state boundaries, attracting internationalist interest yet lacking precise definition, while empirical trends and varying rights‑vs‑membership definitions challenge its applicability. The essay evaluates whether transnational citizenship can address issues of globalization from below by integrating recent sociological, anthropological, and geographic findings into political science. It organizes its analysis around propositions that synthesize transnational civil society literature with migrant civic and political participation studies, then contrasts two sets of definitional choices. Only a narrowly bounded definition—essentially dual or multiple citizenship for migrants—survives conceptual scrutiny.
▪ Abstract What “counts” as transnational citizenship? Like the related notions of global or transnational civil society, the term's appeal to internationalists is greater than its conceptual precision. However, a wide range of empirical trends do raise questions about the nation-state-based approach to the concept of citizenship. In an effort to avoid conceptual stretching, this essay assesses the degree to which the concept of transnational citizenship helps to address issues raised by “globalization from below.” Because many approaches to citizenship focus on the dynamics and texture of participation, this review incorporates recent findings in sociology, anthropology, and geography into the political science discussion. The essay is organized by propositions that bring together analysis of two distinct empirical literatures, on transnational civil society and on migrant civic and political participation. The review concludes by contrasting two cross-cutting sets of definitional choices. The discussion is framed by a recognition that definitions of citizenship vary along two main dimensions: in their emphasis on rights versus membership, and in high versus low intensity. Only a very bounded definition of transnational citizenship holds up under conceptual scrutiny, limited to what is also called dual or multiple citizenship for migrants.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1