Global health ethics: the rationale for mutual caring

Solomon R. Benatar, Abdallah S. Daar, Peter Singer

International Affairs · 2003 · 240 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Despite twentieth‑century scientific advances, global inequity has worsened, with widening health disparities and unmet human rights aspirations. The authors argue that an interdisciplinary bioethics approach can improve global health. They propose expanding bioethics into a results‑oriented global health ethics grounded in shared values and five transformational approaches.

Abstract

Despite spectacular twentieth century scientific and technological progress, the world is more inequitable than it was fifty years ago. This is evident both in terms of access to health care for individuals, and in relation to the health of whole populations. Disparities in wealth and health within and between nations are widening inexorably and the rapidly expanding global economy has failed to reduce poverty among those with little if any access to health care. In this context the Universal Declaration of Human Rights remains an unrealized aspiration for the majority of the world's people. Given these realities, no single discipline, or body of knowledge is likely to make much difference. For example, approaches based only on neo—liberal economics, as exemplified by the structural adjustment programmes of the World Bank, have not been successful in promoting health equity. The authors believe that an interdisciplinary approach is required, and that bioethics, an interdisciplinary field, can make a contribution towards improving health globally. To do this, the scope of bioethics should be expanded towards a results—oriented global health ethics, based upon widely shared and foundational values that could be carried forward through five transformational approaches.

References

17