New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 93 citations · 15 references
LawEmergency MedicineTort LawEmergencyMedical MalpracticePatient SafetyEmergency LegislationEmergency Medical Services PolicyEmergency Medical Services RegulationMedical Malpractice In HospitalsMedical NegligenceStandard Of CareEmergency Care PolicyEmergency Medicine LiabilityEmergency Standard Of CareInpatient Admission RatesMalpractice Coverage Across StatesMedicare Fee-for-servicePatient Outcomes MeasurementSingle-case Quasi-experimental Design
BACKGROUND: Many believe that fear of malpractice lawsuits drives physicians to order otherwise unnecessary care and that legal reforms could reduce such wasteful spending. Emergency physicians practice in an information-poor, resource-rich environment that may lend itself to costly defensive practice. Three states, Texas (in 2003), Georgia (in 2005), and South Carolina (in 2005), enacted legislation that changed the malpractice standard for emergency care to gross negligence. We investigated whether these substantial reforms changed practice. METHODS: Using a 5% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, we identified all emergency department visits to hospitals in the three reform states and in neighboring (control) states from 1997 through 2011. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compared patient-level outcomes, before and after legislation, in reform states and control states. We controlled for characteristics of the patients, time-invariant hospital characteristics, and temporal trends. Outcomes were policy-attributable changes in the use of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), per-visit emergency department charges, and the rate of hospital admissions. RESULTS: For eight of the nine state-outcome combinations tested, no policy-attributable reduction in the intensity of care was detected. We found no reduction in the rates of CT or MRI utilization or hospital admission in any of the three reform states and no reduction in charges in Texas or South Carolina. In Georgia, reform was associated with a 3.6% reduction (95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 6.2) in per-visit emergency department charges. CONCLUSIONS: Legislation that substantially changed the malpractice standard for emergency physicians in three states had little effect on the intensity of practice, as measured by imaging rates, average charges, or hospital admission rates. (Funded by the Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations and others.).
15
Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty
Anupam B. Jena, Seth A. Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Law, Health Law, Tort Law +15
Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine?
Daniel P. Kessler, Mark McClellan · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1996 · 628 citations
Law, Health Law, Tort Law +11
National Costs Of The Medical Liability System
Michelle M. Mello, Amitabh Chandra, Atul A. Gawande et al. · Health Affairs · 2010 · 494 citations