Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2011 · 504 citations · 44 references
HumanitiesArchaeologyEvolutionary BiologyCultural AnthropologyHuman EvolutionPrehistoric ArchaeologyCognitive EvolutionEvolutionary AnthropologyLithic TechnologyPalaeolithic ArchaeologyPaleolithic ArchaeologyStone Tool TechnologyAncient ToolmakingCognitive ArchaeologyComplexityHuman Cognitive EvolutionLithic BehaviorPalaeolithic ArtifactsPaleolithic CognitionTool Use Evolution
Human culture’s unprecedented technological, symbolic, and social complexity raises questions about whether it stems from cognitive evolution, cultural evolution, or their interaction, and while Palaeolithic stone tools offer a continuous record of change, no systematic method yet exists to describe their complexity and diversity. The study aims to better understand patterns of increasing cultural diversity, complexity, and change rates in human evolution by presenting an initial system to describe Palaeolithic stone tool complexity and diversity. The authors develop a systematic method for describing the complexity and diversity of Palaeolithic stone tools, leveraging their abundant and continuous record. The results indicate that Palaeolithic culture change rates have been underestimated and that technological complexity and diversity are directly linked, suggesting that cognitive evolution and the expanded cultural variation enabled by complex technologies jointly explain this pattern.
Although many species display behavioural traditions, human culture is unique in the complexity of its technological, symbolic and social contents. Is this extraordinary complexity a product of cognitive evolution, cultural evolution or some interaction of the two? Answering this question will require a much better understanding of patterns of increasing cultural diversity, complexity and rates of change in human evolution. Palaeolithic stone tools provide a relatively abundant and continuous record of such change, but a systematic method for describing the complexity and diversity of these early technologies has yet to be developed. Here, an initial attempt at such a system is presented. Results suggest that rates of Palaeolithic culture change may have been underestimated and that there is a direct relationship between increasing technological complexity and diversity. Cognitive evolution and the greater latitude for cultural variation afforded by increasingly complex technologies may play complementary roles in explaining this pattern.
44
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
ダーウィン チャールス, 田中 茂穂 · Tokyo Jinrui Gakkai zasshi · 1907 · 11K citations · Full text
The problem of serial order in behavior
K. S. Lashley · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · 1951 · 2.2K citations