Circulation · 2013 · 687 citations · 20 references
MedicineCardiologyPharmacotherapyCardiovascular PharmacotherapyInterventional CardiologyPreventive CardiologyAntiplatelet TherapyAntithrombotic TherapyAtrial FibrillationThromboembolism PreventionThrombosisThrombosis PreventionAtrial Fibrillation-related ThromboembolismEmbolic RiskPercutaneous Left Atrial Appendage ClosurePrimary Stroke PreventionProphylactic AnticoagulationSurgical Left Atrial Appendage ClosureSystemic AnticoagulationWatchman Device
BACKGROUND: The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70). CONCLUSIONS: The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.
20
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Stuart J. Connolly, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Salim Yusuf et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 11.2K citations · Full text
Prevalence of Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Adults
Alan S. Go, Elaine M. Hylek, Kathleen A. Phillips et al. · JAMA · 2001 · 6.2K citations
Yoko Miyasaka, Marion E. Barnes, Bernard J. Gersh et al. · Circulation · 2006 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Stuart J. Connolly, John W. Eikelboom, Campbell Joyner et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 2.4K citations · Full text
David R. Holmes, Vivek Y. Reddy, Zoltan G. Turi et al. · The Lancet · 2009 · 2.2K citations