Annual Review of Anthropology · 1979 · 563 citations · 34 references
Social SciencesAnthropologySociologyCultural AnthropologyFamily StudiesIndigenous StudiesFamily ContextsFamily LifeFamily OrganizationFamily StructureFamily SystemsHousehold StructureFamily SociologyIndigenous Family StructuresMeaning PostulatesVictorian Family Life
The study highlights the urgent need to examine Australian family life, noting that existing depictions are confused by ethnographic biases that impose European characteristics on Aboriginal families and that family features depend on broader societal structures. The authors aim to conduct a detailed, context‑sensitive analysis of Australian family life, following Malinowski’s suggestion to use a vague definition of family when studying societies different from our own. Their analysis demonstrates that a comprehensive, detailed study enables a complete and exact description of the family unit.
cts of family lif e in Australia was urgently needed. He claimed that the confusion and contradiction in extant depictions of the Australian family were due to certain theoretical postulates and axioms adopted by some ethnographers. Principal among these was the attribution of Eu ropean characteristics to the aboriginal family without adequate investiga tion of the details of actual family relationships. As an antidote to such inclinations, Malinowski proposed that we begin the study of the family in societies diff erent from our own by attaching only a vague meaning to the term family. For the essential features of the individual family, as of all other social institutions, depend upon the general structure of a given society and upon the conditions of life therein. A careful and detailed analysis of family life and of different aspects of the family unit in connection with other social phenomena is therefore necessary. Such an analysis enables us to describe the said unit in a complete and exact way (91, p. 6).
34
World Revolution and Family Patterns.
Philip E. Slater, William J. Goode · American Sociological Review · 1964 · 1.3K citations