Journal of Experimental Botany · 2010 · 76 citations · 32 references
AgricultureAgronomyCrop SciencesOilseed Crop SciencePlant NutritionSeed ScienceCrop NutritionNutrient PartitioningOilseed Crop PhysiologyOilseed Nutrient ManagementSeed AvailabilitySeed StorageCritical Growth StagesFertilizationNutrient Allocation To SeedsPartitioningResource Allocation To SeedsSeed FillingSeed Nutrient FillingShoot Nutrient Partitioning
How the remobilization of S and N reserves can meet the needs of seeds of oilseed rape subject to limitation of S fertilization remains largely unclear. Thus, this survey aims to determine the incidence of sulphate restriction [low S (LS)] applied at bolting [growth stage (GS) 32], visible bud (GS 53), and start of pod filling (GS 70) on source-sink relationships for S and N, and on the dynamics of endogenous/exogenous S and N contributing to seed yield and quality. Sulphate restrictions applied at GS 32, GS 53, and GS 70 were annotated LS(32), LS(53), and LS(70). Long-term (34)SO(4)(2-) and (15)NO(3)(-) labelling was used to explore S and N partitioning at the whole-plant level. In LS(53), the sulphur remobilization efficiency (SRE) to seeds increased, but not enough to maintain seed quality. In LS(32), an early S remobilization from leaves provided S for root, stem, and pod growth, but the subsequent demand for seed development was not met adequately and the N utilization efficiency (NUtE) was reduced when compared with high S (HS). The highest SRE (65 ± 1.2% of the remobilized S) associated with an efficient foliar S mobilization (with minimal residual S concentrations of 0.1-0.2% dry matter) was observed under LS(70) treatment, which did not affect yield components.
32
Sulphur in crop production — invited paper
Heinrich W. Scherer · European Journal of Agronomy · 2001 · 563 citations
Agriculture, Agronomy, Crop Sciences +12
Philippe Malagoli · Annals of Botany · 2005 · 206 citations · Full text