The Oncologist · 2013 · 23 citations · 32 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyBreast OncologyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapyBreast Cancer OncologyBreast Cancer PharmacotherapyCancer ImmunotherapyHer2-positive Breast CancerImmunotherapy For Breast CancerBreast Cancer ChemotherapyBreast Cancer Hormone TherapyBreast Cancer Response AssessmentClinical RemissionHer2-positive Breast Cancer ImmunotherapyHer2-positive Breast Cancer TherapyIntent-to-treat EffectPhase Ii Investigation
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of two different schedules of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (PCarH) for HER2-positive, locally aggressive (stage IIB-IIIC) breast cancers were evaluated in this phase II trial. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either weekly (12 doses over 16 weeks) or once-every-3-weeks (4 doses over 12 weeks) treatment. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete remission (pCR) in the breast and axilla. To detect an assumed 35% pCR absolute difference between the two schedules, a minimum of 26 assessable patients in each group was required (two-sided α = 0.05, β = 0.2). RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were enrolled (weekly group, n = 29; every-3-weeks group, n = 27). In the intent-to-treat analysis, pCR in the breast/axilla were found in 31 patients (55%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41%-69%). Compared with the every-3-weeks schedule, the weekly administration achieved higher pCR (41% vs. 69%; p = .03). After adjustment for clinical and pathological factors, the weekly administration was more effective than the every-3-weeks schedule, with hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1-0.9; p = .03). Interestingly, weekly administration resulted in high pCR rates in both luminal-B (HER2-positive) and ERBB2+ tumors (67% vs. 71%; p = .78), whereas luminal-B (HER2-positive) tumors benefited less from the every-3-weeks schedule compared with the ERBB2+ tumors (21% vs. 62%, p = .03). These results remain after multivariate adjustment, showing weekly administration was more effective in the luminal-B (HER2-positive) subgroup (p = .02) but not in the ERBB2+ subgroup (p = .50). CONCLUSION: A more frequent administration might improve the possibility of eradicating invasive cancer in the breast and axilla, especially in the luminal-B (HER2-positive) subtype. Further studies to validate our findings are warranted.
32
Trastuzumab after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Martine Piccart, Marion Procter, Brian Leyland‐Jones et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +16
Antonio C. Wolff, M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Jared N. Schwartz et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2006 · 4.5K citations · Full text
M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Daniel F. Hayes, Mitch Dowsett et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · 4.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +14
Adjuvant Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Dennis J. Slamon, W. Eiermann, Nicholas J. Robert et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy
Roman Rouzier, Charles M. Perou, W. Fraser Symmans et al. · Clinical Cancer Research · 2005 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +17