Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis.

TLDR

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of septate versus bicornuate uteri is critical because they require different operative approaches, and HSG has been the primary diagnostic modality for Müllerian defects. Septate uteri can be corrected via hysteroscopic metroplasty, whereas bicornuate uteri require abdominal surgery. HSG alone correctly identified only 55% of cases, rising to 62.5% with gynecologic evaluation and 90% when combined with ultrasound, yet remains inadequate unless the uterine cavity angle is ≤75°, and luteal‑phase ultrasound is frequently required to distinguish septate from bicornuate uteri.

Abstract

Since two müllerian defects, the septate and bicornuate uteri, are no longer repaired by means of the same operative approach, an accurate preoperative diagnosis of these anomalies is now critical. A septum can be removed by means of hysteroscopic metroplasty. However, repair of a bicornuate uterus still requires abdominal surgery. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) has been the primary diagnostic modality for müllerian defects. On the basis of 63 patients, HSG findings alone, as interpreted by the radiologist, had a diagnostic accuracy of 55%. When this was supplemented with a gynecologic evaluation, the diagnostic accuracy improved to only 62.5%. However, when a diagnostic protocol that include ultrasound (US) examination with HSG was used for evaluating müllerian defects, the diagnostic accuracy improved to 90%, with all errors being noncritical. Therefore, it is concluded that HSG alone is not adequate to make the distinction between a septate and a bicornuate uterus unless the angle of divergence of two straight uterine cavities is 75 degrees or less, indicating a septate uterus. Luteal-phase US is frequently necessary to distinguish between these anomalies or to diagnose them in combination.