Publication | Closed Access
A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language
290
Citations
77
References
1980
Year
NeuropsychologyCritical ReviewNeurolinguisticsAcquired Apraxia Of SpeechAcquired AphasiaPsycholinguisticsLanguage SystemAphasiaCognitive NeuroscienceSpeech And Language DisordersHealth SciencesCognitive ScienceAphasia Neuro-rehabilitationArtsLanguage NetworkLanguage DisorderSpeechlanguage PathologyLanguage ScienceMotor SpeechA Neuropsychological TheoryAcquired Neurogenic Communication DisordersLanguage ComprehensionSpeech PerceptionLinguisticsNeurogenic Communication DisordersNeuropsychological Model
Recent literature review broadens the classical definition of Broca's aphasia and examines its neuroanatomical implications. The study proposes a neuropsychological theory that attributes Broca's aphasia to separable psychological mechanisms disrupted by focal brain damage. Broca's aphasia symptoms arise from a central syntactic parsing disruption and an independent articulatory deficit affecting speech output.
ABSTRACT A neuropsychological theory is offered to account for the syndrome of Broca's aphasia. A critical review of the literature, with emphasis on recent research, provides the basis for a redefinition of the syndrome that considerably broadens its classical description. The argument is advanced that the focus of neuropsychological explanation should be on theoretically separable psychological mechanisms that might be disrupted in relative isolation from other components in conditions of focal brain damage, rather than on isolated units of aphasic performance. The symptoms that characterize Broca's aphasia are explained as predictable behavioral manifestations of a central disruption of the syntactic parsing component of the language System, coupled with a (theoretically independent) articulatory deficit that affects only the speech output System. The neuroanatomical implications of this argument are considered within the framework of the classical “strong localizationist” hypothesis.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1