Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · 2007 · 203 citations · 30 references
Social SciencesPsychologyDifferential Item FunctioningIndividual DifferencesPsychometricsAnxiety DisordersCross-cultural InvarianceFactor AnalysisMental HealthPsychological AssessmentPsychological TestingCross-cultural Adaptation Of InstrumentsCross-cultural Measurement EquivalenceCross-cultural PsychologyCross-cultural Scale ValidationPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ValidityRepresentative SamplesSomatic Symptoms Of Anxiety
Abstract The cross‐cultural validity of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ) in the Dutch population has been examined by comparing the psychometric properties and equivalence in factor structure and normative scores of the Dutch OQ with the original American version. Data were collected from a university ( n = 268), in a community ( n = 810) and from three mental health care organizations ( n = 1920). Results show that the psychometric properties of the Dutch OQ were adequate and similar to the original instrument. Some differences in equivalence were found though. In factor analysis, two additional factors were found: one consisting of social role items and another that reflected anxiety and somatic symptoms. Furthermore, normative scores were different for the Dutch and American samples, and this resulted in different cut‐off scores for estimating a clinically significant change in the Dutch population. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
30
Jacob Cohen · Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · 42.2K citations
Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2
SH Lovibond, PF Lovibond, S. H. Lovibond et al. · 1995 · 7.1K citations
Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire
Thomas Meyer, Mark L. Miller, R. Metzger et al. · Behaviour Research and Therapy · 1990 · 5.1K citations