Publication | Closed Access
Expression of Profibrotic Mediators in Small Airways versus Parenchyma after Cigarette Smoke Exposure
54
Citations
23
References
2008
Year
AsthmaInflammatory Lung DiseaseLung InflammationPathologyLaser Capture MicrodissectionTobacco ControlRespiratory ToxicologySmoke ExposureSmoking Related Lung DiseaseLung DepositionCigarette Smoke ExposureProfibrotic MediatorsPulmonary FibrosisGene ExpressionCell BiologyTumor MicroenvironmentLung CancerPulmonary DiseasePhysiologyBronchial NeoplasmMedicine
Cigarette smoke-induced lung disease presents a morphologic contradiction in that the small airways become fibrotic but the parenchyma becomes emphysematous over time. To examine the mechanisms behind these phenomena, we exposed mice to cigarette smoke for up to 6 months and isolated small airways from histologic sections by laser capture microdissection. We then removed residual airway tissue and vessels, and collected the remaining parenchymal tissue. Gene expression of 13 fibrogenic growth/signaling factors (particularly TGF-beta-related genes), matrix proteins, or enzymes involved in matrix production was examined by real-time RT-PCR. Combining present and previously published data from our laboratory, in the airways over the long term there was a sustained and marked increase in expression of almost all of these genes. By contrast, in the parenchyma, expression of most genes was elevated at 2 and 24 hours after initial exposure, and all were elevated at 1 month; but by 6 months, when emphysema was present, most genes (9/13) were either at control values or down-regulated below control. At 3 months, several genes that were considerably elevated at 1 month were back to control levels, suggesting that loss of the parenchymal response precedes the development of emphysema. We conclude that with smoke exposure the airways demonstrate an ongoing profibrotic/proelastogenic response and the parenchyma a generally anti-fibrotic/anti-elastogenic response, but one that develops only with long-term exposure to smoke. These observations support the idea that the parenchyma largely fails to repair smoke-induced matrix damage, but this phenomenon is a relatively late event.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1