National Competition Policy*

Stephen King

Economic Record · 1997 · 182 citations · 33 references

Concepts

TL;DR

National competition policy reforms in Australia are not fully aligned with underlying economic principles, risking monopoly pricing through negotiated infrastructure access and overlooking integration benefits in government enterprise restructuring. The study aims to determine whether simple legislative amendments or a deeper understanding of trade‑offs can better improve competition policy. The policy has significantly impacted Australian industry, with all governments adopting Hilmer committee recommendations, though legislative review has sparked considerable political controversy.

Abstract

National competition policy is having a major effect on Australian industry. The Hilmer committee recommendations on infrastructure access, competitive neutrality, restructuring of public enterprises and legislative review have been accepted by all Australian governments. The underlying economic principles, however, are not necessarily reflected in the reforms. The process of negotiated infrastructure access established under national competition policy may lead to monopoly rather than competitive pricing. Structural reforms of government business enterprises have ignored the benefits of integration and the relevant market characteristics. Legislative review has resulted in considerable political controversy. In some cases, competition policy can be improved by simple amendments to legislation while in other cases a clearer understanding of the relevant trade‐offs may improve the reform process.

References

33