The Journal of Urology · 2001 · 158 citations · 12 references
MedicineNephrologySurgeryGeneral SurgeryKidney TransplantationTransplant SurgeryKidney SurgeryLaparoscopic NephrectomyLaparoscopic Renal SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgeryLiving Donor Kidney TransplantationRenal SurgeryHand-assisted Laparoscopic NephrectomyOpen NephrectomyRecipient Graft SurvivalRenal Functional Outcomes After Laparoscopic NephrectomySurgical NephrectomyTransperitoneal Laparoscopic NephrectomyTransperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery
PURPOSE: In experienced hands laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be safe for procuring kidneys for transplantation that function identically to open nephrectomy controls. While searching for a safer and easier approach to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, hand assisted laparoscopic techniques have been added to the surgical armamentarium. We compare allograft function in patients with greater than 1-year followup who underwent open donor (historic series), classic laparoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 48 patients who underwent open donor, laparoscopic donor or hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy were reviewed. Only patients with greater than 1-year followup and complete charts were included in our study. Of these patients 34 underwent consecutive laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy and 14 underwent open donor nephrectomy. Mean patient age plus or minus standard deviation (SD) was 36.5 +/- 8.4 years for donors and 29 +/- 17 for recipients at transplantation (range 13 months to 69 years). In the laparoscopic group 11 patients underwent the transperitoneal technique, and 23 underwent hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. RESULTS: Total operating time was significantly reduced with the hand assisted laparoscopic technique compared with classic laparoscopy, as was the time from skin incision to kidney removal and warm ischemic time. Average warm ischemic time plus or minus SD was 3.9 +/- 0.3 minutes for laparoscopic nephrectomy and 1.6 +/- 0.2 for hand assisted laparoscopy (p <0.05). Long-term followup of serum creatinine levels revealed no significant differences among the 3 groups. Comparison of those levels for recipients of open nephrectomy versus laparoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic techniques revealed p values greater than 0.5. No blood transfusions were necessary. Complications included adrenal vein injury in 1 patient, small bowel obstruction in 2, abdominal hernia at the trocar site in 1 and deep venous thrombosis in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Classic laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies appear to be safe procedures for harvesting kidneys. The recipient graft function is similar in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups.
12
Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy
Peter G. Schulam, Louis R. Kavoussi, Adam D. Cheriff et al. · The Journal of Urology · 1996 · 981 citations
Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy
John L. Flowers, Stephen C. Jacobs, Eugene Cho et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1997 · 468 citations
LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE
Stephen C. Jacobs, Eugene Cho, Brian J. Dunkin et al. · The Journal of Urology · 2000 · 382 citations
Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
J. Stuart Wolf, Marie‐Blanche Tchetgen, R.M. Merion · Urology · 1998 · 236 citations