The Astrophysical Journal · 2006 · 185 citations · 74 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsObservational AstronomyX-ray AstronomyExtragalactic X-ray SourcesX-ray DetectionX-ray SpectroscopyAbsorption Line SpectroscopyQuasar SurveysSpectral Absorption PropertiesX-ray SpectraX-ray Surveys
We present 4-7 ks Chandra observations of 35 Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasars from the Large Bright Quasar Survey, the largest sample of sensitive, 0.5-8.0 keV X-ray observations of this class of quasars to date. The limited ranges in both redshift (z=1.42-2.90) and UV luminosity (a factor of ~12) of the sample also make it relatively uniform. Of 35 targets, 27 are detected for a detection fraction of 77%, and we confirm previous studies that find BAL quasars to be generally X-ray weak. Five of the eight non-detections are known low-ionization BAL quasars, confirming reports of extreme X-ray weakness in this subset (~10% of optically selected BAL quasars). Those BAL quasars with the hardest X-ray spectra are also the X-ray weakest, consistent with the interpretation that intrinsic absorption is the primary cause of X-ray weakness in this class of quasars as a whole. Furthermore, the observed trend is not consistent with simple neutral absorption, supporting findings from spectroscopic observations of individual targets that BAL quasars typically exhibit complex X-ray absorption (e.g., partially covering or ionized absorbers). In sum, high-ionization BAL quasars are typically neither intrinsically X-ray weak nor suffer from Compton-thick absorption. In general, we find no evidence for correlations between X-ray weakness and UV absorption-line properties, with the exception of a likely correlation between the maximum outflow velocity of CIV absorption and the magnitude of X-ray weakness. We discuss the implications of our results for disk-wind models of BAL outflows in quasars. (abridged)
74
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 18.1K citations · Full text
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
Donald G. York, Jennifer Adelman, John E. Anderson et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2000 · 10.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14
J. J. Condon, W. D. Cotton, E. W. Greisen et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 1998 · 5.8K citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +12
J. M. Dickey, Felix J. Lockman · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · 1990 · 4.6K citations