British Journal of Urology · 2014 · 86 citations · 26 references
MedicineRadiologyUrologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyUltrasonographyGenitourinary ImagingProstate BiopsyProstate CancerProstate ImagingTransrectal UltrasonographyUrologic Cancer DiagnosisMagnetic Resonance Imaging - Targeted BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion BiopsyMri-targeted BiopsyMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)Systematic BiopsySystematic Prostate BiopsyTargeted Prostate BiopsyTransrectal Biopsy
OBJECTIVES: To compare targeted, transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US)-fusion biopsy to systematic transrectal biopsy in patients with previous negative or first prostate biopsy and to evaluate the gain in diagnostic information with systematic biopsies in addition to targeted MRI/US-fusion biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 263 consecutive patients with suspicion of prostate cancer were investigated. All patients were evaluated by 3-T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) applying the European Society of Urogenital Radiology criteria. All patients underwent MRI/US-fusion biopsy transperineally (mean nine cores) and additionally a systematic transrectal biopsy (mean 12 cores). RESULTS: In all, 195 patients underwent repeat biopsy and 68 patients underwent first biopsy. The median age was 66 years, median PSA level was 8.3 ng/mL and median prostate volume was 50 mL. Overall, the prostate cancer detection rate was 52% (137/263). MRI/US-fusion biopsy detected significantly more cancer than systematic prostate biopsy (44% [116/263] vs 35% [91/263]; P = 0.002). In repeat biopsy, the detection rate was 44% (85/195) in targeted and 32% (62/195) in systematic biopsy (P = 0.002). In first biopsy, the detection rate was 46% (31/68) in targeted and 43% (29/68) in systematic biopsy (P = 0.527). In all, 80% (110/137) of biopsy confirmed prostate cancers were clinically significant. For the upgrading of Gleason score, 44% (32/72) more clinically significant prostate cancer was detected by using additional targeted biopsy than by systematic biopsy alone. Conversely, 12% (10/94) more clinically significant cancer was found by systematic biopsy additionally to targeted biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: MRI/US-fusion biopsy was associated with a higher detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer while taking fewer cores, especially in patients with prior negative biopsy. Due to a high portion of additional tumours with Gleason score ≥7 detected in addition to targeted biopsy, systematic biopsy should still be performed additionally to targeted biopsy.
26
Rebecca L. Siegel, Deepa Naishadham, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Jelle O. Barentsz, Jonathan Richenberg, R. Clements et al. · European Radiology · 2012 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Jonathan I. Epstein, Zhaoyong Feng, Bruce J. Trock et al. · European Urology · 2012 · 666 citations