BMC Health Services Research · 2015 · 57 citations · 15 references
Dissaving is potentially a convenient proxy for catastrophic costs that does not require usage of complex patient cost questionnaires. It also offers an informative indicator of financial hardship in its own right, and could therefore play an important role as an indicator to monitor and evaluate the impact of financial protection and service delivery interventions in reducing hardship and facilitating universal health coverage. Further research is required to understand the patterns and types of dissaving that have the strongest relationship with financial hardship and clinical outcomes in order to move toward evidence-based policy making.
15
Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis
Ke Xu, David Evans, Kei Kawabata et al. · The Lancet · 2003 · 2.3K citations
Protecting Households From Catastrophic Health Spending
Ke Xu, David Evans, Guido Carrin et al. · Health Affairs · 2007 · 1.1K citations