2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009 · 2.9K citations · 28 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningMachine VisionImage ClassificationKernel MethodsOptimization For Machine LearningPattern RecognitionRepresentation LearningSupport Vector MachinesComplexityMax PoolingSparse CodingSpatial MatchingSpatial Pyramid MatchingSvmsTrainingVector Quantization
Recently SVMs using spatial pyramid matching (SPM) kernel have been highly successful in image classification. Despite its popularity, these nonlinear SVMs have a complexity O(n <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ∼ n <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> ) in training and O(n) in testing, where n is the training size, implying that it is nontrivial to scaleup the algorithms to handlemore than thousands of training images. In this paper we develop an extension of the SPM method, by generalizing vector quantization to sparse coding followed by multi-scale spatial max pooling, and propose a linear SPM kernel based on SIFT sparse codes. This new approach remarkably reduces the complexity of SVMs to O(n) in training and a constant in testing. In a number of image categorization experiments, we find that, in terms of classification accuracy, the suggested linear SPM based on sparse coding of SIFT descriptors always significantly outperforms the linear SPM kernel on histograms, and is even better than the nonlinear SPM kernels, leading to state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks by using a single type of descriptors.
28
Chih-Chung Chang, Chih‐Jen Lin · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · 2011 · 41.3K citations
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Vittorio Ferrari · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2008 · 10.1K citations