IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2003 · 761 citations · 29 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine VisionRobot VisionMotion AnalysisMotion EstimationObject DetectionObject RecognitionVideo AnalysisVisual TrackingBenchmark DatasetsComparative EvaluationEmpirical EvaluationShadow Analysis
Moving shadows can cause misclassification in dynamic scene analysis, leading to segmentation and tracking errors, yet a comparative evaluation of existing detection algorithms is still missing. The paper surveys moving shadow detection methods and provides a comparative empirical evaluation of representative algorithms. The authors categorize algorithms into four classes—two statistical and two deterministic—and introduce quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate them on indoor and outdoor video benchmarks. The authors release a benchmark suite of indoor and outdoor video sequences with ground‑truth data to facilitate further research.
Moving shadows need careful consideration in the development of robust dynamic scene analysis systems. Moving shadow detection is critical for accurate object detection in video streams since shadow points are often misclassified as object points, causing errors in segmentation and tracking. Many algorithms have been proposed in the literature that deal with shadows. However, a comparative evaluation of the existing approaches is still lacking. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of moving shadow detection approaches. We organize contributions reported in the literature in four classes two of them are statistical and two are deterministic. We also present a comparative empirical evaluation of representative algorithms selected from these four classes. Novel quantitative (detection and discrimination rate) and qualitative metrics (scene and object independence, flexibility to shadow situations, and robustness to noise) are proposed to evaluate these classes of algorithms on a benchmark suite of indoor and outdoor video sequences. These video sequences and associated "ground-truth" data are made available at http://cvrr.ucsd.edu/aton/shadow to allow for others in the community to experiment with new algorithms and metrics.
29
Wallflower: principles and practice of background maintenance
Kentaro Toyama, John Krumm, Barry Brumitt et al. · 1999 · 1.7K citations
S.J. McKenna, S. Jabri, Azriel Rosenfeld et al. · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · 2000 · 658 citations
Social Sciences, Organization Studies, Organizational Behavior +10