American Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2013 · 89 citations · 17 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyPediatric OncologySurgical OncologyTumor PathologyMalignant NeoplasmsMalignant TumorsPediatric SarcomasPediatric TumorsTumor ClassificationTumor MorphologyCellular DistributionHistologic Differential DiagnosisMatched Control GroupPediatric Cancer FusionsSarcoma Pathology
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the frequency of fusion-negative alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMSn) increased coincident with changes in the definition of alveolar histology. METHODS: We re-reviewed alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) in the Children's Oncology Group study D9803, comparing histopathology with fusion status. RESULTS: Our review of 255 original ARMS cases (compared with a control group of 38 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas [ERMS] cases) revealed that many had an ARMS-like densely cellular pattern with cytologic features and myogenin expression more typical of ERMS. Following re-review, 84 (33%) cases of original ARMS were rediagnosed as ERMS. All reclassified ERMS, including dense ERMS, were fusion negative, whereas 82% of confirmed ARMS cases were fusion positive. Total ARMS diagnoses returned to historic rates of 25% to 30% of all rhabdomyosarcomas, and ARMSn decreased from 37% to 18% of ARMS cases. The outcome of reclassified ERMS was similar to confirmed ERMS. CONCLUSIONS: To address the role of fusion status in risk stratification, pathologists should include both a histologic diagnosis and an evaluation of fusion status for all new ARMS diagnoses.
17
Jane L. Meza, James R. Anderson, Alberto S. Pappo et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2006 · 392 citations · Full text
Carola A.S. Arndt, Julie A. Stoner, Douglas S. Hawkins et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 367 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +11