Otolaryngology · 2008 · 84 citations · 18 references
MedicineAudiologyOtolaryngologyCochlear ImplantsCost-utility AnalysisOtologyCochlear DisordersCochlear ImplantationHearing ImpairmentHearing LossSpeech Perception OutcomesSurgical ImplantationCochlear Implant UseCost-effectiveness Of Cochlear ImplantationCost-utility Ratio
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore improvements in quality of life and the cost-utility of bilateral cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective case-control study was conducted on 23 bilateral cochlear implant patients with the Mark III health utility index. RESULTS: Results indicate a 0.48 mean gain in health utility after bilateral cochlear implantation and a discounted cost per quality adjusted life year of $24,859 in this cohort of patients. With a comparison of patient scores for unilateral and bilateral use, improvements in the domains of hearing, speech, emotion, and cognition were noted, resulting in a mean gain in health utility of 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an improvement in quality of life and a favorable cost-utility associated with bilateral cochlear implantation in patients with profound hearing loss. These patients showed additional improvements in quality of life after they received their second implant. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study that showed improvements in quality of life and a favorable cost-utility after bilateral cochlear implantation in patients with profound hearing loss.
18
Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐Effectiveness
Tammy O. Tengs, Miriam E. Adams, Joseph S. Pliskin et al. · Risk Analysis · 1995 · 1.3K citations
Pharmacy, Pharmacoeconomics, Cost-effectiveness Analysis +11
Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children
George A. Gates · JAMA · 1995 · 211 citations
Medicine, Audiology, Otolaryngology +17