The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning

TLDR

Patients’ perspectives on impaired functioning highlight its importance in clinical assessment. The study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). The authors analyzed data from two studies, conducting reliability analyses (internal consistency, test–retest, parallel forms) and examining convergent and criterion validity relative to disorder severity. WSAS demonstrated good internal consistency (α 0.70–0.94), a test–retest correlation of 0.73, strong correlations.

Abstract

BackgroundPatients' perspectives concerning impaired functioning provide important information.AimsTo evaluate the reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS).MethodData from two studies were analysed. Reliability analyses included internal scale consistency, test – retest and parallel forms. Convergent and criterion validities were examined with respect to disorder severity.ResultsCronbach's α measure of internal scale consistency ranged from 0.70 to 0.94. Test – retest correlation was 0.73. Interactive voice response administrations of the WSAS gave correlations of 0.81 and 0.86 with clinician interviews. Correlations of WSAS with severity of depression and obsessive–compulsive disorder symptoms were 0.76 and 0.61, respectively. The scores were sensitive to patient differences in disorder severity and treatment-related change.ConclusionsThe WSAS is a simple, reliable and valid measure of impaired functioning. It is a sensitive and useful outcome measure offering the potential for readily interpretable comparisons across studies and disorders.