Concepedia

Abstract

Abstract In order to clarify the effect of defect orientation on the fatigue limit of two types of steels, JIS‐S15C and JIS‐S45C, a small semi‐circular slit was introduced onto the surface of a round specimen. The slit was tilted at 0 °, 30 ° or 60 ° with respect to the plane normal to the loading axis, but all of them had the same defect size, = 188 µm, where the area denotes the area of the domain defined by projecting the defect on a plane normal to the loading axis. In all the combinations of the materials and tilt angles, a non‐propagating crack was found at or just below the fatigue limit, that is, the fatigue limit was determined by the non‐propagation condition of a crack initiated from the defect. In both steels, the fatigue limit was found to be nearly independent of the tilt angle for the same value of projected size , which was in good agreement with the prediction by the parameter model. In this paper, a mechanistic explanation for the insensitivity of the fatigue limit to the tilt angle is proposed.

References

YearCitations

Page 1