Current Medical Research and Opinion · 2003 · 30 citations · 12 references
MedicineOphthalmologyPharmacotherapyAllergyHypersensitivityOcular PharmacologyAllergic ConjunctivitisAllergic RhinitisOcular AllergyOphthalmic FormulationsOphthalmic OintmentsTopical Ophthalmic MedicationsAllergic Conjunctivitis ManagementAllergic Conjunctivitis PharmacotherapyConjunctivitis TreatmentEye Drop TolerabilityParallel Study DesignsSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisSeasonal Allergic Rhinitis TreatmentSwelling
OBJECTIVE AND SETTING: Azelastine (AZE) in a novel, eye drop, formulation, was compared with topically applied sodium cromoglycate (SCG) and placebo (PLA) in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhino-conjunctivitis in a multicentre, parallel group study. RESEARCH DESIGN: 144 subjects ranging in age from 16 to 65 years participated. All had at least a 2-year history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and were symptomatic at the time of inclusion. Medications were administered topically either twice daily (AZE/PLA) or four times daily (SCG) over a 2-week treatment period. Method and outcome measures: Azelastine and placebo were compared double-blind; the comparison versus SCG was carried out in an open manner. Itching, redness, flow of tears, eyelid swelling, foreign-body sensation, photophobia, soreness and discharge were scored on a 4-point severity scale. RESULTS: Results for the decrease of main conjunctivitis symptoms (itching, tearing and conjunctival redness) showed a marked effect for both active treatments on day 3 with a sustained improvement on days 7 and 14. A clear response to treatment (an improvement of sum scores for day 3 of >/=3 points compared to baseline) occurred in 85.4% of azelastine-treated patients, 83.0% of sodium cromoglycate patients and 56.3% of placebo patients. Response rates for both active treatments were statistically superior to those for placebo (azelastine p = 0.005; sodium cromoglycate p = 0.007). Global assessment of efficacy was at least 'satisfactory' for 90.0% of azelastine patients, 81.3% of sodium cromoglycate patients and 66.3% of placebo-treated patients. The most frequent adverse effects were transient application site reactions which tended to disappear with increasing duration of treatment, and, less frequently, taste perversion. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the therapeutic use of azelastine eye drops in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhino-conjunctivitis can be recommended.
12
Giorgio Ciprandi, Caterina Pronzato, Giovanni Passalacqua et al. · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 1996 · 107 citations
Markku Leino, K. ENNEVAARA, A.‐L. LATVALA et al. · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · 1992 · 48 citations