Radiation Protection Dosimetry · 2005 · 25 citations · 6 references
MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyDigital ImagingChest RadiographyChest RadiologyImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentMedical ImagingRadiographic ImagingAmorphous SiliconDigital Chest RadiographyDigital Radiography DetectorsFlat-panel Detector PerformanceFlat-panel Detector SystemsImage Quality BenchmarkingPatient Dose ReductionRadiographic Image Quality
An evaluation of the image quality of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector system and a computed radiology system compared with a screen-film system was performed by means of contrast-detail phantom images. Hard and soft copy images were evaluated. Although patient dose at clinical settings was strongly decreased with the amorphous silicon system, the low-contrast visibility with this system was still significantly better than with the screen-film system. For the computed radiology system, low-contrast visibility was comparable to the screen-film system. Best results were obtained by soft copy reading at full resolution with adaptation of contrast and brightness. Changing tube voltage (102-133 kV), or additional filtration, did not significantly affect image quality. However, low-contrast visibility improved significantly with increasing exposure. It was clearly demonstrated that, in chest imaging, the amorphous silicon system has superior imaging characteristics compared to the screen-film and the computed radiology system.
6
Klaus Bacher, Peter Smeets, Kris Bonnarens et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 2003 · 153 citations
Xiujiang Rong, Chris C. Shaw, Xinming Liu et al. · Medical Physics · 2001 · 97 citations
Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions with Normal and Reduced Radiation Dose
M. Strotzer, J. Gmeinwieser, Markus Völk et al. · Investigative Radiology · 1998 · 64 citations