European Journal of Orthodontics · 2015 · 94 citations · 17 references
DentistryOral Health SciencesOrthodonticsMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsOrthodontic AppliancesAge-related Oral Mucosal ChangesAging BiomechanicsAppliance DesignBiomechanics Of Fixed AppliancesIntraoral Orthodontic AppliancesOrthodontic MaterialsAging Effects On Denture AppearanceAging PhenomenaAppliance Wear DurationChemical PropertiesFunctional Appliance-induced Incisor ChangesOrthodontic Material AgingProsthodontic Age Effects
To investigate the mechanical and chemical alterations of Invisalign appliances after intraoral aging. Samples of Invisalign appliances (Align Technology, San Jose, California, USA) were collected following routine treatment for a mean period of 44±15 days (group INV), whereas unused aligners of the same brand were used as reference (group REF). A small sample from the central incisors region was cut from each appliance and the buccal surface was analysed by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy ( n = 5). Then the appliances were cut ( n = 25) and embedded in acrylic resin, ground/polished in a grinding polishing machine, and the prepared surfaces were subjected to Instrumented Indentation Testing under 4.9 N load. Force-indentation depth curves were recorded for each group and the following parameters were calculated according to ISO 14577-1; 2002 specification: indentation modulus ( EIT ), elastic to total work ratio also known as elastic index (η IT ), Martens Hardness (HM), and indentation creep ( CIT ) The mean values of the mechanical properties were statistically analysed by unpaired t -test ( a = 0.05). ATR-FTIR analysis confirmed the urethane based structure of the appliances, without important chemical differences attributed to the aging process. INV group showed significantly lower EIT (REF: 2466±20, INV: 2216±168MPa), HM (REF: 119±1, INV: 110±6 N mm −2 ) and higher η IT (REF: 40.0±0.3, INV: 41.5±1.2%), and CIT (REF: 3.7±0.2 INV: 4.0±0.1%). The increase in η IT indicates that INV is a more brittle than REF, whereas the increase in CIT , a decrease in creep resistance. Despite the lack of detectable chemical changes, intraoral aging adversely affected the mechanical properties of the Invisalign appliance.
17
Mareike Simon, Ludger Keilig, Jörg Schwarze et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2014 · 285 citations