International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · 2011 · 325 citations · 121 references
Public PolicyCommunity ResilienceDisaster Risk ManagementDisaster ManagementDisaster ResilienceNatural HazardsDisaster VulnerabilityAdaptive GovernanceDrr LiteratureDisaster MitigationDisaster Risk ReductionEnvironmental Policy
The rising frequency, intensity, and severity of natural hazards pose a pressing global environmental challenge, yet most studies on governance for resilience lack grounding in comparable theories, underscoring a gap in the scholarship. This article aims to clarify the conceptual interlinkages among adaptive governance, resilience, and disaster risk reduction, and to examine how AG characteristics develop, trade off, and benefit resilience. The authors conduct a conceptual review and case‑study analysis of adaptive governance characteristics, exploring terminology diversity, implementation trade‑offs, and their influence on resilience across hazard and disaster contexts. They identify four key AG characteristics—polycentric institutions, participation, self‑organization, and learning—that enhance resilience, and outline how these contribute to disaster risk reduction literature and future research directions.
The increasing frequency, intensity, and severity of natural hazards is one of the most pressing global environmental change problems. From the local to the global level, governments and civil society need to increase resilience to these hazards. Despite what is now a very sizeable literature on designing governance systems to produce resilience, a substantial gap in the natural hazards scholarship remains because most studies have lacked grounding in comparable theories on governing for resilience. This article contributes to interdisciplinary research on the conceptual understanding of the interlinkages of adaptive governance (AG), resilience, and disaster risk reduction (DRR). Through better understanding of diversity of terminology, terms, and characteristics, we take a step forward towards mutual learning and intellectual experimentation between the three concepts. Our review shows that there are four characteristics of AG that are important to help increase resilience to natural hazards. These are polycentric and multilayered institutions, participation and collaboration, self-organization and networks, and learning and innovation. The article examines the development, tradeoffs, and benefits that arise from the implementation of the AG characteristics, and reviews their influence on resilience. Hazard and disaster case studies are then examined to see how each AG characteristic is viewed and implemented in disaster contexts. Based on this analysis, the contributions of AG to the DRR literature are identified, before outlining the implications for theory and further research.
121
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Maurice Bloch, Jean Lave, Étienne Wenger · Man · 1994 · 39.8K citations
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Barry C. Field · Land Economics · 1992 · 19.1K citations · Full text
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Sherry R. Arnstein · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · 1969 · 15.2K citations