JAMA · 1966 · 33 citations · 2 references
MedicineGynecologyObstetricsContraceptionReproductive MedicineReproductive PathologyEndometrial BiopsyIntrauterine ContraceptionIntrauterine DevicesUterine PathologyEndometrial CytologyEndometrial FindingsIntrauterine Contraceptive DevicesStainless Steel ImplantsUterine HistologyUterine Inflammation
The human uterine cavity is a space of variable size and configuration.<sup>1</sup>Intrauterine contraception, by its very nature, introduces a foreign body into this space, to the presence of which the uterus must accommodate. Any uterine-tissue reaction to the intrauterine device, if present, should be apparent in the endometrium, the lining of the uterine cavity in direct contact with the device. Intrauterine contraception has enjoyed a resurgence of popularity since 1959. During the past five years, uterine bacteriology<sup>2,3</sup>and cytology have been studied in association with the device. Other than superficial appraisal by the endometrial biopsy, uterine pathology has been given little reported attention.<sup>4</sup>Allen,<sup>5</sup>examining the histological findings from 18 uteri that had contained a stainless steel ring from six days to five months, noted no evidence of endometrial infection. More recently, Willson and his co-workers<sup>6</sup>reported on observations made of 292 endometrial specimens
2
R. W. Noyes, Arthur T. Hertig, John A. Rock · Fertility and Sterility · 1950 · 2.9K citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Pathology +7
The Intrauterine Ring for Conception Control
Herbert H. Hall, Martin L. Stone, Alexander Sedlis et al. · Fertility and Sterility · 1964 · 13 citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +14