International Journal of Systematic Theology · 2005 · 34 citations · 4 references
HumanitiesHistoryPhilosophyHermeneuticsNew TestamentTheologyBiblical ExegesisNew Testament HermeneuticsEternal LifeLiterary FreedomNew Testament Criticism
Abstract: In the New Testament, the Son is personally pre-existent in a real (as opposed to ideal) sense, and the incarnation is a free, gracious act on the part of the Son. The present article engages critically with the arguments of Robert Jenson that the Son is pre-existent principally (a) in and as the nation of Israel, and (b) in that the Son's eternal birth from the Father precedes his birth from Mary; this ‘precedes’ is not linear, or temporal, however. It is concluded that Jenson's account fails on two counts: first, it does not do justice to the canonical witness; secondly, it is incoherent in introducing an atemporal element into Jenson's avowedly temporal construal of the divine identity. The Son's gracious freedom should be seen both in creation and incarnation in a much stronger sense than Jenson allows.
4
Robert W. Jenson · International Journal of Systematic Theology · 2000 · 32 citations
Humanities, History, Philosophy +17
Christ's Pre-Existence in Pauline Soteriology
Brendan Byrne · Theological Studies · 1997 · 20 citations
Response to Watson and Hunsinger
Robert W. Jenson · Scottish Journal of Theology · 2002 · 20 citations
Arts, Philosophy, Systematics +3