Publication | Closed Access
How Decision-Makers Cope with Uncertainty
18
Citations
9
References
1996
Year
Behavioral Decision MakingDecision ScienceIndividual Decision MakingUncertain ReasoningSocial SciencesPsychologyUncertainty QuantificationSelf ReportsDeep UncertaintyRisk ManagementManagementDecision TheoryCognitive ScienceBehavioral SciencesHigh UncertaintyStrategyExperimental PsychologyReal WorldDecision-makingBusinessUncertainty ManagementInadequate Understanding
We analyzed 112 self reports of decision-making under uncertainty to find how decision makers conceptualize uncertainty and cope with it in the real world. The results show that decision makers distinguish between three types of uncertainty, inadequate understanding, incomplete information and undifferentiated alternatives, to which they apply five strategies of coping, reducing uncertainty, assumption-based reasoning, weighing pros and cons of competing alternatives, suppressing uncertainty, and forestalling. The relationships between these types of uncertainty and tactics of coping suggest a R.A.W.F.S. (Reduction, Assumption based reasoning, Weighing pros and cons, Forestalling and Suppression) heuristic of contingent coping with uncertainty in naturalistic settings.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1