Publication | Open Access
A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip
60
Citations
22
References
2011
Year
The cumulative survival with both reoperation and revision as the endpoint was better for the cemented stems with up to 3 years of follow-up. Thereafter, the survival curves converged, mainly because of increasing incidence of revision due to loosening in the cemented group. We recommend the use of cemented long stems in patients with limited bone loss and in older patients.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1